Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5179 (RAJ)

ASHISH YADAV S/O SHRI BHUPENDRA YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1703/2025 · 2025-02-03

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4585] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1703/2025 Ashish Yadav S/o Shri Bhupendra Yadav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Badod, Tehsil Digod, District Kota (Raj.) Presently Working On The Post Of Conductor In Baran Depot ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, H.q. Jaipur Through Managing Director 3. Executive Director (Traffic.), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, H.q. Jaipur 4. Chief Manager, Rsrtc Baran Depot, Sadar Bazar, Baran. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Intjar Ali for Mr. R. D. Meena For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 03/02/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with a liberty to file a representation before the concerned respondent/competent authority. In the facts and circumstances, relying upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Shilpi Bose & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & ors. reported in 1991 Supp (2) SCC 659, this Court directs the respondent-Department that the representation filed by the petitioner (within fifteen days from the date of passing of this order) be decided in accordance with law, [2025:RJ-JP:4585] (2 of 2) [CW-1703/2025] by way of a speaking order, pronto. The respondent-Department will be at liberty to pass any further order(s) considering the administrative exigencies, strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of with the aforementioned directions. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /192