URGYEN RICHHEN BHUTIA v. THE REGISTRAR OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF FIRMS AND ORS.
WPA/448/2025 · 2025-03-06
Jay Sengupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51764 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51764 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
17 06.03.2025
Calcutta High Court NB Ct. 02
In The Circuit Bench At Jalpaiguri
Appellate Side
WPA 448 of 2025
Urgyen Rinchhen Bhutia
Vs. The Registrar, Office of the Registrar Of Firms, Societies & Non-trading Corporation, West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Jagriti Mishra, Ms. Mrinmayee Das.
…for the petitioner.
Mr. Hirak Barman, Mr. Sumit Kumar.
…for the State.
Learned senior counsel representing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner is a member of the Shantiniketan Residents Welfare Society registered under the West Bengal Societies Registration Act, 1961. The petitioner found certain irregularities in the functioning of the Welfare Society. Accordingly, he made a representation on 26th June, 2024 before the Registrar. But, the same has not been considered as yet.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that in the event a representation is pending
consideration, the same would be decided in accordance with law. In view of the above, let the respondent no.3 consider the petitioner’s representation dated 26th June, 2024 in accordance with law and after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as expeditiously as
2
possible, preferably within a period of ten weeks from the date of communication of this order. With these observations, the writ petition is
disposed of. As affidavits were not called for, allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)