1 2025:CGHC:51018-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5373 of 2025 Gopal Agrawal S/o Late Kirolomal Agrawal Aged About 18 Years R/o Village Khonsara, Tehsil- Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya (Central University) Through Its Vice Chancellor, Koni, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Registrar Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Koni, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Dean School of Studies In Engineering And Technology, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Koni, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Shreyansh Singh Student, B.Tech Programme, School of Studies In Engineering And Technology, Ggv, Koni, Bilaspur, C.G. 5 - Kaushik Kumar Nishad Student, B.Tech Programme, School of Studies In Engineering And Technology, Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Koni, Bilaspur, C.G. 6 - Gaurav Kumar Verma Student, B.Tech Programme, School of Studies In Engineering And Technology, Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Koni, Bilaspur, C.G. 7 - Counselling Committee/ Admissions Office Guru Ghasidas University, Koni, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents _________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Harsh Dave, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 14.10.2025 1 Heard Mr. Harsh Dave, learned counsel for the petitioner. ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 2 The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers : “A. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus quashing and setting aside the impugned admissions of Respondent Nos. 4. 5 and 6 to the B.Tech (Industrial & Production Engineering) branch of Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, made during spot counselling on 15/09/2025, for being contrary to the Spot Counselling Guidelines, Preference Rule (Rule 15 qua the Respondent No. 4, 5 & 6), & Rule 2 qua the Respondent No.4), and merit list. B. Direct Respondent (University authorities) to admit the Petitioner, Gopal Agrawal, to the B.Tech (Industrial & Production Engineering) programme against the seat(s) vacated by cancellation of the aforesaid illegal admissions, or otherwise secure admission to the Petitioner forthwith in the said branch for the academic session 2025-26. C. Declare that any admission granted in violation of the eligibility norms, merit list, or Preference Rule (Rule 15 and Rule 2) qua the Private Respondents is void and liable to cancellation, and cannot prejudice the rights of an eligible candidate, i.e. the Petitioner. D. Grant any other relief or order deemed just and proper by this Hon'ble Court in the facts and circumstances of the case, including the costs of the petition.” 3 I.A. No. 02/2025 has been filed by the petitioner for withdrawal of the instant petition on the ground that he has already been granted admission by the respondent University. 3 4 Accordingly, I.A. No. 02/2025 is allowed and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra