- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48556-DB WP No. 6568 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 6568 OF 2025 (BDA) BETWEEN: R.SRIRAMA S/O LATE N.RAMASWMY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/A 162, YELETHOTADAPALYA, GOLLAHALLI, ANJANAPURA POST, UTTARAHALLIHOBLI, BENGALURU-560 108. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHETHAN.A.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, ROOM NO.436, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. B.R.AMBEDKARVEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. VIJAYASHANKAR C.H., S/O LATE CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, PRESENTLY GOVERNOR OF MEGHALAYA, - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48556-DB WP No. 6568 of 2025 RAJ BHAVAN, SHILLONG-793 001, MEGHALAYA STATE. 4. MRS. VANGALA ESWARAMMA, W/O V.NARASI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/A 530/B, 18TH MAIN, HSR LAYOUT-SECTOR-3, BENGALURU-560 102. 5. MR. VANGALA SREENIVASA REDDY, S/O V.NARASI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/A 530/B, 18TH MAIN, HSR LAYOUT-SECTOR-3, BENGALURU-560 102. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.S.ARUNA., AGA FOR R1; SRI. MURUGESH.V.CHARATI., ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. HARSHA.P.BANAD., ADVOCATE FOR R3) SRI. CHENNAKESHAVA.B.K., ADVOCATE FOR R4 & 5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO REVIEW AND RECALL THE JUDGEMENT OF THIS COURT DATED 08/09/2023 IN WP NO.21198/2022 AND DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION IN WP NO.21198/2022 (ANNEXURE-A) AND DIRECT THE 2ND RESPONDENT BDA TO EXECUTE THE SALE DEED FOR SITE NO.89B IN HSR LAYOUT 3RD SECTOR, BENGALURU TO THE PETITIONER AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH & HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48556-DB WP No. 6568 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he would like to withdraw the writ petition and file a review petition seeking review of the order dated 08.09.2023 passed in W.P.No.21198/2022. His submission is that the petitioner was not a party in the said writ petition and allotment of site of the petitioner has been cancelled and in pursuance of the impugned order, the site has been confirmed in favour of third respondent. The petitioner9s rights have been affected without he being a party in the writ petition. 2. We therefore, dismiss this writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to seek a review of the impugned order passed by the co-ordinate bench of this Court. (D K SINGH) JUDGE (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE YN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1 Digitally signed by DINESH KUMAR SINGH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA