Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51753 (ALL)

SHAKIR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/23307/2025 · 2025-07-14

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114925 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23307 of 2025 Applicant :- Shakir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhanshu Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Sudhanshu Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Amrit Raj Chaurasiya, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime No. 180 of 2025, u/s 109, 352, 115(2), 333, 351(2) of BNS, P.S. Sardhana, District Meerut, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. It is further submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant and all the injuries as caused to the victim are simple in nature. It has been further submitted that the co-accused Jubair Alias Chhotu, has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.15928 of 2025 vide order dated 20.06.2025. He further submitted that the applicant has criminal history of one case which has been explained in paragraph no. 5 of the supplementary affidavit. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 30.03.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Shakir, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Manoj Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad