Oleti Nageswaramma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/11442/2025 · 2025-04-30
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51740 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51740 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[3457 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH. WRIT PETITION NO: 1144? OF 2025 Between: Oleti Nageswaramma, W/o Nageswara Rao, Aged about 60 D.No. 14-1-7, Bhimarajupalem Veedi. Mangalapalem, Prakasam District ...PetItioner/s years, Rio AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Department, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Karnool road Ongole, Praksasm District Home Near Flyover,
4. The Circle Inspector of Police, I Town Police Station Near Municipal Office, Ongole, Praksasm District
5. The Sub Inspector of Police, I Town Police Station Near Municipal Office. Ongole, Praksasm District
6. Jampana Roshini(Sameera), W/o Rama Krishna Governor Road, Governer Road Aged about 34 years R/o Mangamur Road Back Side of Panchamuka Anjaneya Swamy Temple, Ongole Town, Prakasam District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the,High Court be pleased to issue a writ order or direction may more particularly wit of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent upon the application dated 17-04-2025 Nos. 2 to 5 have failed act wherein the Petitioner sough
action against Respondent No. 6 for unlawfully obtaining possession of the Petitioner's blank cheques, promissory notes, and Rs100/- denomination stamp papers despite the Petitioner repaying an amount exceeding the agreed sum and threatening of grievous harm, including death threats to the petitionens family through Respondent no. 6 associates and goons is illegal, arbitrary violative of articles
14. 21 & 300-A and consequently pleased to dine respondent No. 4 and 5 to consider the petitioners representation dated 17 04-2025.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct respondent No.4 and 5 to consider the petitioners representation dated 17-04-2025; Counsel for the Petitioner:M/s. S LAKSHMI PRAMEELA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ■-U-
APHC010217622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) • I [3457] H H THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11442/2025 Between: Oleti Nageswaramma, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.S LAKSHMI PRAMEELA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: Heard
learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in failing to act upon the
2. representation of the petitioner dated 17.04.2025. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home submits that the representation of the petitioner dated 17.04.2025, will
3. be considered by the respondents, as per the law.
2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is.
4. inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the respondents 4 and 5 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 17.04.2025, in accordance with law and as per the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (for short, ‘'BNSS”).
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission. No costs.
6. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. /T\ SDI- G HELA NAIDU assistant SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// -To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Secretariat Amaravathi, State of Andhra Pradesh (BY Buildings SPECIALMESSENGER) 2 The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District.
3. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Karnool road, Near Flyover, Ongole, Praksasm District
4. The Circle Inspector of Police. I Town Police Station, Governor Near Municipal Office, Ongole, Praksasm District I Town Police Station, Governor Road, Road.
5. The Sub Inspector of Police Near Municipal Office, Ongole, Praksasm District 6 Jampana Roshini(Sameera). W/o Rama Krishna. Aged about 34 years, R/o Mangamur Road Back Side of Panchamuka Anjaneya Swamy Temple, Ongole Town, Prakasam District (Addressee Nos.2 to 6 BY RPAD) M/s. S LAKSHMl PRAMEELA Advocate [OPUC] GP FOR HOME .High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
7. OneCCto
8. Two CCs to
9. Three CD Copies
HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025
ORDER WP.No.11442 of 2025 ,S 13 JUN 2025 ★ DISPOSSING THE WRIT PETITIION