PRASANTA KUMAR SARKAR v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, COOCHBEHAR AND ORS
WPA/406/2025 · 2025-03-03
Jay Sengupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51739 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51739 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
18 03.03.2025
Calcutta High Court NB Ct. 02
In The Circuit Bench At Jalpaiguri
Appellate Side
WPA 406 of 2025
Prasanta Kumar Sarkar
Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Coochbehar & Ors.
Mr. Debabrata Dhar,
…for the petitioner (in vc).
Mr. Pretom Das, Ms. Rima Sarkar.
…for the State.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that despite the petitioner’s complaint making out a cognizable case, no FIR was registered at the local police station. Accordingly, the complaint was forwarded to the concerned Superintendent of Police. But, no steps were taken.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State relies on a report, which is taken on record, and submits that the FIR has already been registered on the complaint of the petitioner being Kotwali PS Case No.202 of 2025 dated 25.02.2025 under Sections 61(2), 314, 316(2), 318(2) and 318(4) of the BNS Act. As the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, no further order need be passed. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of without any further order, even as to costs.
2
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)