- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35577 RP No. 195 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REVIEW PETITION NO. 195 OF 2024 IN R.S.A.No.1509/2019 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI. K.R. RANGANATH S/O. K.R. RANGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SHANTHINAGARA, DAFEDAR BUILDING (A.S.PALYA), BEHIND RAILWAY STATION, TUMAKURU-572 101. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAIK N.R., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. MANJULA W/O. K.N.KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDENT OF GOKULA INDUSTRIES, CHANDRABAVI MEDIGESI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 132. &RESPONDENT THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN RSA NO.1509/2019 (PAR) AND REVIEW THE ORDER PASSED ON 15.03.2021 BY THIS HON9BLE COURT. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35577 RP No. 195 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has sought for review of the judgment passed by this Court in R.S.A. No.1509/2019 on the ground that the respondent was not the daughter of Sri.K.R.Rangaswamy but was fostered by him and that the father of the petitioner was the only son of Sri.K.R.Rangaswamy. 3. Since this Court has decided the appeal based on the available material, the petitioner cannot seek review of the said judgment. There is no error apparent on the face of the record. Hence, this petition is dismissed. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE BKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1