Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATl WRIT PETITION NO: 14744 OF 2002 v/ Between: K. Vij^ Kumar, S/o Guravaiah, Velgode, Kurnool District. Ram^rishnudu, S/o Venkata Swami, Velgode, Kurnool District. ...Petitioners
1. 2. G. AND
1. The Secretary,, Board of Intermediate Education, Hyderabad. 2. The Correspondent, Junior College, Velgode, Kurnool District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 2^ of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring as illegal and arbitrary the action of the respondents in not regularising the Services of the Petitioners having reg^d to length of Service in terms of G.O.Ms. No. 328"education dated 15-10-1997 and issue a consequential direction to the respondents to forthwith regularise the service of the petitioners with all consequential benefits such as seniority arrears of salary, increments etc I.A. NO: 1 OF 2002fWPMP. NO: 18436 OF 2002) ^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be
pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioners in service in the 2"^^ respondent College. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 19909 OF 2005) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the case in WP.No.14744 of 2002 by fixing an early date. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2005fWPMP. NO: 31123 OF 2005) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to advance WVMP.No. 2021/2003 by expedite the hearing of WP No. 14744/2002. v'-' I.A. NO: 3 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 33068 OF 20051 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing WP.No. 14744/2002 by fixing an early date.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI D V SITARAMAMURTHY Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI B LINGAYYA CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N BHARAT BABU Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K V CHALAPATHI RAO-^ The Court made the following order:
i APHC010212772002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0:*B [3332] wi. 0L THURSDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14744/2002 Between: ...PETITIONER(S) K. Vijaya Kumar and Others AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The Secretary and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. B LINGAYYA CHOWDARY
2. D V SITARAMAMURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. 2.N BHARAT BABU 3.K VCHALAPATHI RAO The Court made the following:
ORDER: On 03.04.2025 and 17.04.2025, there is no representation for the petitioners and the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today
2. there is no representation for the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case.
2 Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There
3. shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M.PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR r ^ SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. One CC to Sri D V Sitaramamurthy, Advocate [OPUC
2. One CC to Sri B Lingayy^howdary, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri N Bharat B^u, Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to Sri K V Chafa'pathi Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CD Copies , RAM
HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 X 2 t MAY 2025 \ ^ . Current aecuon . ^^sfifspKrcVi^y’'
ORDER & WP.No.14744of 2002 DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS