APHC010456892021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27592/2021 Between: 1. GARAPATI SURYANARAYANA, S/O. SEETARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATEAND VICE SARPANCH, R/O.MANDALAPALLI VILLAGE, DAMMAPETA MANDAL, BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM DISTRICT, TELANGANA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT DOOR NO.601, VIBHA RESIDENCY, KATURU ROAD, VUYYURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHARA PRADESH. 3. KANDEPI VAMSIDHAR, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 0/O. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GUNTUR RANGE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. N KISHORE, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 0/O. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SIVAJI, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GANNAVARAM POLICE STATION, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent not considering the petitioner representation dated 20-04-2021 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to investigate into the matter basing on the petitioner's representation dated 20-04-2021 and to take action against the 3rd to 5th respondents and others who were conspired with the 3rd respondent, and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to investigate into the matter basing on the petitioner's representation dated 20-04-2021 and to take action against the 31'd to 5th respondents and others who were conspired with the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G KONDALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. C V R RUDRA PRASAD The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27592/2021 ORDER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent not considering the petitioner representation dated 20.04.2021 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to investigate into the matter basing on the petitioner's representation dated 20-04-2021 and to take action against the 3rd to 5th respondents and others who were conspired with the 3rd respondent, and pass…” 2. Heard Sri G.Kondala Rao, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 29.10.2025 JLV/RMR 4 22 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27592/2021 Dt.29.10.2025 JLV/RMR