Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51720 (AP)

THE BHEEMDOL SUGARS STAFF AND WORKERS UNION, v. THE PRL. SECRETARY TO GOVT. SECRETARIAT,HYDERABAD & 3

WP/22438/2004 · 2025-04-30

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 1.5Ml) THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE • ' A- I S' i & .m. ‘“***5 a-vt!? ¥. no i--' PRESENT N ic THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22438 OF 2004 Between: The Bheemdol Sugars Staff and Workers Union, Regd. No. G-1900 (Recognised) Rep. by its President Sri Pagadala Venkatratnam Naidu Kesava Rao, Age 47 , R/o 24-A. 25-7,Pattebad, Eluru. S/o ...Petitioner AND 1. The PrI. Secretary to Govt. Secretariat Department, A.P. Secretariat, "D" Block, Hyderabad. 2. The Public Enterprises (IS) Commissioner and Commissioner/Registrar of Coop. Hyderabad. Director of Sugar & Cane, Societies, Andhra Pradesh, 3. Managing Director, The West Godavari Coop. Sugars Ltd. Surappagudem (V), Bhimadole, West Godavari District. 4. Chairman and Managing Director, The Andhra Sugars Surappagudem , Bhimadole, West Godavari District. Ltd., Unit III, ...Respondents ■4^ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue order or orders or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent 1 to 3 in closing down the 3'^^ respondent factory without following due procedure contemplated in Sec. 25F, 25FF, 25FF(A), and 25 FFF of Industrial disputes Act 1947 as illegal, arbitrary and consequentially direct the respondents to follow the statutory provisions. may I.A. NO: 1 OF 2004fWPMP. NO: 29436 OF 20041 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents 1 to 4 to continue all the workers including NMRs in their respective posts on same terms and conditions and pay the salaries pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.L. ALI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR AGRICULTURE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4: SRI. C KODANDA RAM The Court made the following: APHC010155792004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0M0 [3332] 0?©: THURSDAY JHE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22438/2004 Between: The Bheemdol Sugars Staff And Workers Union ...PETITIONER AND The PrI Secretary To Govt Secretariat Hyderabad 3 and ...RESPONDENT(S) Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.M L ALI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.C KODANDA RAM 2.GP FOR AGRICULTURE 3.A JAYANTHI 4.THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: ORDER: On 28.03.2025 and 17.04.2025, there is no representation for the petitioners and the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today, there is no representation for the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There 2. 3. shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Y ^ SECT/dN officer 1. The PrI. Secretary to Govt., Secretariat, Public Enterprises (IS) Department, A.P. Secretariat, "D" Block, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner and Director of Sugar & Cane, Commissioner/Registrar of Coop. Societies, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3. Managing Director, The West Godavari Coop. Sugars Ltd, Surappagudem (V), Bhimadole, West Godavari District. 4. Chairman and Managing Director, The Andhra Sugars Ltd., Unit III, Surappagudem, Bhimadole, West Godavari District. 5. One CC to SRI. M L ALI, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR AGRICULTURE ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. One CC to SRI. C KODANDA RAM, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Three CD Copies To, sree % HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.22438 of 2004 9 DISMISSING THE W.P FOR non-prosecution without costs IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE |« TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE W V PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 40205 OF 2018 Between: aSomeswara Rao, S/o. B.Gowri Naidu, Aged .28 yrs, Occ. FTE, R/o. D.No.1- Parvathipuram Mandal, 82, Dubagaddi Street, Jagannadhapuram Vijayanagaram District-535501. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Union of India, Ministry of Rural Development, Krushi Bhavan Delhi Represented by its Deputy Secretary/Under Secretary. 2. The District Collector, Vizianagaram District at Vizianagaram. , New 3. Society for Rural Development Services, Rural Development, 5th floor, 29-6-6/1, Nakkala Road, Suryaraopeta, Vijayawada-2, Rep. by its Commissioner. 4. The Project Director DWMA, [ Employment Guarantee Scheme Vizianagaram. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural , O/o The District Collectorate, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings issued by respondent no.2 vide R.C.No. 2490/2018H.R.M.S, Dt. one 14.09.2018 as illegal arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and Article 14 and 21 of constitution of India R/w Society for Rural Development Services Disciplinary Rules, 2012 and lA NO: 1 OF 2ni« consequently set aside the same. Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings issued by respondent no.2 vide R.C.No. 2490/2018H.R.M.S, Dt. 14.09.2018 . praying that in the circumstances pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KPS SAILESH „ REDDY REPRESENTING SRI PAVAN KUMAR ADITYA MALLADI Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI NAMAVARAPU R RAO (CENTRAL GOVT. COUNSEL) Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4: SRI M S The Court made the following: ORDER R CHANDRA MURTHY e APHC010833672018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 40205/2018 Between: B.Someswara Rao ...PETITIONER AND The Union of India and others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PAVAN KUMAR ADITYAMALLADI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.NAMAVARAPU R RAO (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 2.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 4. M S R CHANDRA MURTHY The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: . .pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings issued by respondent No.2 vide R.C.No.2490/2018 H.R.M.S, Dt. 14.09.2018 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India R/w Society for Rurai Deveiopment Services Discipiinary Rules, 2012 and consequently set aside the same and pass ...” 2 2. Sri K.P.S.Sailesh Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Pavan Kumar Aditya Malladi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel for MGNREGS would submit that they have complied the interim order. Petitioner has been continuing in service. No further orders are required in this matter in the light of the compliance of interim order. 3 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to Costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P.VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER " Of Rural 2. The District Collector, Vizianagaram District 3. The Commissioner, Society for Rural Development, 5th floor Vijayawada-2. at Vizianagaram. 70 R fi/1 M °PS®u* Services, Rural 9 6 6/1, Nakkala Road, Suryaraopeta, EmploS G“?ranLTheme'"^'o/r\h°^'??-'i • -^ural Vizianagaram. Scheme, O/o The District Collectorate, 5. One CC to Sri Pavan Kumar Aditya Malladi, Advocate [OPUC] Hig^h 8ourt of:lndhrfprS. ToPUC^f '"'f- JoPUq R Rao (Central Govt. Counsel), Advocate 8. Two CCS to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 9. One CC to Sri Pavan Kumar Aditya Malladi, Advocate [OPUC] 10. Three CD Copies TF / ^ HIGH COURT DATED:19/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.40205 of 2018 DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS