HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1513/2025 Roshan Lal S/o Lallu Ram Bagada Brahmin, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Bada Kuwa Ki Dhani, Tan Kolaheda, Police Station Narayanpur, District Kotputli-Behror (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Jail At District Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 03/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The accused- petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.245/2024, registered at Police Station Tahala, District Alwar, for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the other co-accused Muneem Bhadana and Manish Sharma @ Manish Pande have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 09.01.2025 and 23.01.2025. The accused- petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1513/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposes the grant of bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the above facts and the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Roshan Lal S/o Lallu Ram Bagada Brahmin, in connection with FIR No.245/2024, registered at Police Station Tahala, District Alwar, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner to the trial Court, every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J DEEPA RANI -14