Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3110 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2025 Thana- TILAUTHU District- Rohtas ====================================================== Rahul Kumar S/o Yogendra Mahto @ Yougendra Kumar Verma Village- Tilauthu , PO and PS- Tilauthu , Distt.- Rohtas ... ... Appellant/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Singari Devi W/o Late Dilip Ram Village- Tilauthu , PO and PS- Tilauthu , Distt.- Rohtas ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms.Usha Kumari 1, Spl. P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 12-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 30.06.2025 passed by the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge -17-cum- Special Judge, SC/ST, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Tilauthu P.S. Case No. 143 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.,2023 and Section 3(ii)(v) of the S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the appellant is said to have taken away the victim and thereafter the victim was assaulted and he died.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3110 of 2025(5) dt.12-03-2026 2/2
4. From the allegations levelled in the F.I.R., I am of the considered view that the present anticipatory bail application is not maintainable.
5. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed with liberty to the appellant to surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail.
tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T