IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE i PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2517 OF 2025 Between: Kanakara Uma Maheswara Reddy, S/o Baskar Reddy, Aged about 38 years, Occ F.P. Shop Dealer, R/o D.N0.7-624/A, Piduguralla, Piduguralla Mandal, Palnadu District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi District, Andhra Pradesh State. 2. The District Collector, Narasaraopeta, Palnadu District. Guntur District) 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gurajala, Palnadu District. Guntur District) 4. The Tahsildar, Piduguralla Mandal (Erstwhile Guntur District) Guntur (Erstwhile (Erstwhile Piduguralla, Palnadu District ...Respondents r Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 3 and 4 in not supplying the stock to the Petitioner for the F.P. Shop No. 0791024 Piduguralla, Piduguralla Mandal, Palnadu District (erstwhile Guntur District) and further action of the 3^'^ Respondent in not renewing the authorization of the Petitioner for the above said shop so far is arbitrary, illegal without Jurisdiction and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 the authorization of the Fair Price shop and further direct the / the at to renew Respondents 3 to 4 to supply the stock to the Petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to supply the stock of the Petitioner for the F.P. Shop No. 0791024 at Piduguralla, Piduguralla Mandal, Palnadu District (erstwhile Guntur District), pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH C KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: -.-‘t APHC010042662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3459] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2517/2025 Between: Kankara Uma Maheswara Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State of AP and others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.CH C KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following order: ...RESPONDENT(S) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous, hence, no further orders are required. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- G HELA NAIDU assistant SECTION //TRUE COPY// To 1. One CC to SRI. CH C KRISHNA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC 2. Two CCS to GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Two CCS to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies sree HIGH COURT DATED;24/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.2517 of 2025 ANO/y>^ I HSft!025 g . Current tiection . DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS