APHC010174752020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 11080/2020 Between: 1. GADAM VENKATESWARA RAO, FATHER NAME. LATE VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGE. 60, R/O 67-1-43/3, ASHOKNAGAR, KAKINADA, E.G.DIST., A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KAKINADA RURAL, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.11080 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s vacant house site in an extent of 400 Sq. Yards covered in Patta Nos.50 and 133, L.P.No.1/1985, P.R.No.8/1985, situated in R.S.No.306 of Nemam Gram Panchayat, Kakinada Rural Mandal, East Godavari District for the purpose of distribution of the house sites to the weaker sections under the “Navaratnalu- Pedalandariki Illu Scheme”, without following any due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that, the respondent authorities concerned will follow the due procedure with respect to the subject house site. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land strictly in accordance with law and if the petitioner is otherwise found to be in possession of the same, he shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law, by giving due opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, including the petitioner and upon verification of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits. Any dispossession from the subject land shall not be made except by following the due procedure. 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.11080 of 2020 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 18.09.2025 PGT