Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51706 (ALL)

SMT. UMA DEVI YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/13835/2025 · 2025-09-25

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 13835 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. List has been revised. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. 2. This Court on 17.09.2025 passed the following order:- "1. This Court has passed the following order: "1. Mr. Mahendra Kumar Shukla, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client's account has been seized by respondent no.3 (the Bank). He seeks interference. 2. Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned advocate, Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State. Mr. Gyan Prakash Srivastava, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondent no.3 and hands up documents, inter alia, dated 24th August, 2024 received from the police, directing seizure of the account on value of Rs. 8,80,000/-. 3. On brief perusal of the documents we find, complaint was lodged by petitioner's husband alleging that petitioner had wrongfully sold a plot of land, for which she received said sum. 4. Inspector-in-charge of P.S.- Phoolpur, Police Commissionerate, Prayagraj is added as respondent no.4. Petitioner has leave to cause the amendment in Court, to be countersigned by Court Master. Amended copy of the writ petition be served on Mr. Ansari, to obtain instructions regarding the direction made and consequent course of action by the police. 5. List on 27th May, 2025." 2. Sri Gyan Prakash Srivastva, learned counsel for respondent No.3 on Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gyan Prakash Shrivastava Smt. Uma Devi Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) instructions says that the operation of saving account of petitioner has been stopped on account of instructions of police department. 3. Sri V.K. Dixit, learned Standing Counsel on instructions, submits that an application regarding the missing of the petitioner's wife has been filed by husband of the petitioner, therefore, the S.H.O., Phulpur has instructed not to permit the petitioner to operate the account. 4. Let the S.H.O. Phulpur, Prayagraj, is directed to appear before the Court in person on the next date fixed to explain that under which provision of law he can give such a direction to the bank. 5. Put up as fresh on 25.9.2025." 3. Sri Arvind Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel sates that the account of the petitioner has been de-freezed and is now operational. In this respect, a personal affidavit on behalf of Station House Officer, Police Station Phoolpur, Commissionerate, Prayagraj has been filed today in Court, which is taken on record. 4. In such view of the fact, no further is required to be passed. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. September 26, 2025 NS WRIC No. 13835 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad