p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.9476 of 2025 Saik Tanveer Ahmmad @ Ahemad Petitioner Mr. C. Rout, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. B.P Nayak, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 18.08.2025 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.1227 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned SDJM, Dhenkanal, arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No.454 of 2022 for commission of offence punishable under Sections 379/411/429/120-B of IPC r/w sec 11 (a)(d)(c) of IPC r/w 11 Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1990 r/w sec 7 of Cow Slaughter Act. 3. Learned counsel for the State opposes such prayer. 4. Taking into account the nature of allegations, this Court is not inclined to entertain the application for pre-arrest bail in respect of Petitioner. However, it is directed that the Petitioner may surrender before the p. 2 learned SDJM, Dhenkanal in connection with the aforementioned case within one month from today. In the event of his surrender and motion for bail, the same be considered by the learned SDJM, Dhenkanal on merits, in the first hour of the day. In the event of rejection of the prayer for bail by the learned SDJM, Dhenkanal, the Petitioner is at liberty to move the higher forum for bail in the second hour on the same day. 5. On being so moved, the higher forum is requested to make an endeavour to dispose of the bail application of the Petitioner on the same day on merit in accordance with law. ` The case diary shall be made available to the concerned courts to facilitate disposal of the bail application of the Petitioner and learned SDJM, Dhenkanal is called upon to transmit the case record to the higher forum at the earliest in the event of rejection of such bail application. Ground of Parity, if any, may be considered by the learned court (s) below. 6. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. 7. U.C.C. as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Soumya