Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51690 (AP)

MANEPALLI SIVA PRASAD v. SRI A KANNA BABU

CC/3416/2024 · 2025-11-27

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010366442024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3416/2024 Between: 1. MANEPALLI SIVA PRASAD, S/O LATE. M. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC JUNIOR LECTURER WORKING AS PRINCIPAL (FAC) IN A.P. TRIBAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL JUNIOR COLLEGE BOYS AT JEELUGUMILLI, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI A KANNA BABU, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY-CUM-VICE- CHAIRMAN A.P. TRIBAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, TRIABAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT GURUKULUM, TADEPALLL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SMT S BHARGAVI I A S, THE SECRETARY, THE ANDHRA PRADESH TRIBAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY (GURUKULAM), VIJAYAWADA. MOKSHASAI PLAZA, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. J CHANDRASEKHAR SHARMA, PRINCIPAL, A.P. TRIBAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL JUNIOR COLLEGE BOYS AT JEELUGUMILLI, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for willfully, deliberately violating the interim orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 13030 of 2024 dated 18.06.2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NOOKA JAGANNADHAM 2. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case is filed complaining the violation of the order dated 26.06.2024 passed in W.P.No.13030 of 2024. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the main writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 25.07.2025, no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 28.11.2025 TVN 375 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.3416 OF 2024 Date: 28.11.2025 TVN