Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51689 (AP)

Siddhabhathuni Ranjith Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/11419/2025 · 2025-11-30

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010573912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11419/2025 Between: 1. SIDDHABHATHUNI RANJITH KUMAR, S/O.LATE KAMESHWARAO, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOY, RESIDENT OF FLAT NO.311, 3RD FLOOR, SVR APARTMENTS, SANAKAYALA FACTORY ROAD, GUNTUR. 2. SIDDHABHATHUNI RATNA KUMARI, W/O.LATE KAMESHWARAO, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC HOUSE HOLD, RESIDENT OF H-NO 4-112,KOMURU VILLAGE, GUNTUR 3. JAVANGULA SITARAMANJANI, W/O VENKATA.SRINIVASRAO,AGED 48 YEARS, OCC HOUSE HOLD, RESIDENT OF D NO 236-02-7 NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR 4. JAVANGULA VENKATA KIRAN KUMAR, S/O VENKATA SRINIVASRAO,AGED 24 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOY AT HYDERABAD,OCC RESIDENT OF D-NO 236-02- 7, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHVELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 2. GONUGONDIA NAGAMANI, W/O LATE GONUGONDIA SIVAPRASAD RAO,AGED 52 YEARS. CASTE BY SURYABALIJA, RESIDENT OF FLAT NO. 407,H-NO. 12-1-12, S.U.R.S EMPIRE APARTMENTS,SANAKAYALA FACTORY ROAD, GUNTUR TOWN ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused 1st to 4th in C.C.No. 72 of 2025 On the file of the Court of IV Addl.Civil Judge Court (Junior Division); Guntur in so far as petitioners are concerned Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. PANGA SIVANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PANGA VENKATESWARA RAO 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, has been filed, by the Petitioners/A.1 to A.4, seeking quashment of the Proceedings against them in CC No.72 of 2025 on the file of the Court of IV Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Guntur, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 506 and 509 IPC. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1/State. Perused the material on record. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Petitioners herein are arrayed A.1 to A.4 in above CC and they are falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel would submit that except bald and omnibus allegations, no specific overt acts are attributed against them. At the time of hearing, learned counsel restricted the prayer and requested to dispense with the presence of the Petitioners before the trial Court and the Criminal Petition may be disposed of by giving liberty to the Petitioners to raise such contentions before the trial Court in defence. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Petitioners are at liberty to raise the present contentions before the trial Court in their defence. However, the presence of the Petitioners/A.1 to A.4 before the 3 trial Court is dispensed with, except on the specific dates as directed by the trial Court. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 01.12.2025 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No. 11419 of 2025 01.12.2025 Mjl /*