Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51687 (ALL)

RADHEY SHYAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/32433/2023 · 2025-07-23

Kshitij Shailendra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:121214 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32433 of 2023 Petitioner :- Radhey Shyam And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Hari Narayan Singh Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. Shri Raj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that on account of passing of certain orders subsequent to filing of the present writ petition, the cause of action to press the present writ petition does not survive further and, accordingly, the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. 2. In view of the submissions made, the writ petition is dismissed having become infructuous. Order Date :- 24.7.2025 AKShukla/- Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad