Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51685 (AP)

BETHAPUDI BHARATHI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/23682/2025 · 2025-11-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010451962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23682/2025 Between: 1. BETHAPUDI BHARATHI, W/O. LATE NANCHARAIAH , AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS , OCC HOME MAKER, R/O.D.NO. 123-18-2287, 5THH LANE, AMBEDKAR IDWA MAHANAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTIONS, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR MAGISTRATE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B SESIBUSHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent No.1 and 2 in not appointing the Special Public Prosecutor in S.C.No.27/s/2020 on the file of Special Judge for Trial of cases under SCs & STs (PoA) Act, 1989-IV Additional district & Sessions Judge Court, Guntur as arbitrary, violation of Article 14 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to appoint Special Public Prosecutor in S.C.No.27/S/2020 on the file of the Special Judge for trial of 2 cases under SCs and STs (PoA) Act, 1989-IV Additional Ditrict & Sessions Judge Court, Guntur.” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be closed. 3. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.11.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23682 of 2025 Dt.07.11.2025 Asr