APHC010957492018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 46241/2018 Between: 1. M.ABDUL RAWOOF, S/O.M.ABDUL GAFAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.5-9-161, RAHAMATPUR , HINDUPUR,ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ( HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, HINDUPUR I TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. K IDRIES, S/O.K.HASAN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/O.INDIES PRINTERS, DL ROAD, HINDUPUR,ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. D SRINIVASULU, S/O.LATE DA. OBULESU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.27-6-197-B, MAIN ROAD, LAKSHMI NAGAR, MUDDIREDDYPALLI, HINDUPUR,ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. BANDARU BALAJI, S/O.NOT KONWN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC.EX-MUNICIPAL VICE CHAIRMAN, HINDUPUR TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the actions of the Respondent No.2 in not considering the representation / complaint dated 03.12.2018 for grant of police aid and taking any action against the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 so far and inspite of several requests and Personal approaches of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, improper, and unconstitutional and against the procedure 2 contemplated under the code of criminal procedure and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to consider the representation/written complaint dated 03-12-2018 of the petitioner for grant of police aid and to take action against the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to consider the representation/written complaint dated 03-12-2018 of the petitioner for grant of police aid and to take action against the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V FAROOK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.46241 of 2018 ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is posted today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even on earlier occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing respondent Nos.1 and 2, is in attendance. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 4. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 4th December, 2025 cbn 4 75 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.46241 of 2018 4th December, 2025 cbn