\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13892 OF 2005 Between: 1. K.Lakshmi Nirmala, w/o Bhavani Prasad, Aged 35 years, Occ; Teacher Phase-ll, (Hindi), Long Term Bridge Course Residential School for Girls, Rayachoti, Kadapa. - 2. B.Sailaja w/o Y.S.Chandrasekhar Sharma, Aged 35 years, OcciTeacher Phase-ll, (Social Studies) Long Term Bridge Course Residential School for Girls, Rayachoti, Kadapa. 3. B.Malleshwari, w/o M.Ravanaiah, Aged 35 years, OcciTeacher Phase-I, Long Term Bridge Course Residential School for Girls, Rayachoti, Kadapa. 4. P.V.Renuka Devi, w/o Ramesh Babu, Aged 35 years, Occ;Teacher Phase-I, Long Term Bridge Course Residential School for Girls, Sambepalli, Rayachoti, Kadapa. 5. P.Nagendra Prasad, s/o P.Venkata Subbaiah, Aged 44 years OcciAttender; Long Term Bridge Course Residential School for Girls Sambepalli, Rayachoti, Kadapa. 6. Gnavamani, d/o G.Prakasam, Aged 42 years, Occ;Teacher Phase-I, Long Term Bridge Course Residential School for Girls, Sambepalli^ Rayachoti, Kadapa. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The Secretary, AP Social Welfare Residential Educational Society, Social Welfare Officers Complex, Masab Tank, Hyderabad-28. 2. The District Collector and Chairman, A.P.S.W.R.E.I.Society, Kadapa. 3. The Programme Officer, APSW Long Term Bridge Course, Residential School for Girls, Chenna Mukkapalli, at Rayachoti, Kadapa. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the circular issued in Rc.No.PS3/41767/2004, dated 16-06-2005 issued by the 1st respondent illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent not to terminate the petitioner from service. in as I.A. NO: 1 OF 2005fWVMP. NO: 3515 OF 2005) Between: The Secretary, AP Social Welfare Residential Educational Society, Social Welfare Officers Complex, Masab Tank, Hyderabad-2j8. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND 1. K.Lakshmi Nirmala, w/o Bhavani Prasad, Aged 35 years, Occ; Teacher Phase-ll, (Hindi), Long Jerm Bridge Course Residential School for Girls, Rayachoti, Kadapa. 2. B.Sailaja w/o Y.S.Chandrasekhar Sharma, Aged 35 OcciTeacher Phase-ll, (Social Studies) Long Term Bridge Course Residential School for Girls, Rayachoti, Kadapa^- years 3. B.Malleshwari, w/o M.Ravanaiah, Aged 35 years, OcciTeacher Phase-1, Long Term Bridge Codfse Residential School for Girls, Rayachoti, Kadapa. r 4. P.V.Renuka Devi, w/o Ramesh Babu, Aged 35 years, Occ:Teacher Phase-1, Long Term Bridge Course Residential School for Girls, Sambepalli, Rayachoti, Kadapa. 5. P.Nagendra Prasad, s/o P.Venkata Subbaiah, Aged 44 years, Occ:Attender, Long Term Bridge Course Residential School for Girls, Sambepalli, Rayachoti, Kadapa. 6. Gnavamani, d/o G.Prakasam, Aged 42 years, Occ:Teacher Phase-1, Long Term Bridge Course Residential School for Girls, Sambepalli, Rayachoti, Kadapa. 7. The District Collector and Chairman, A.P.S.W.R.E.I.Society, Kadapa. 8. The Programme Officer, APSW Long Term Bridge Course, Residential School for Girls, Chenna Mukkapalli, at Rayachoti, Kadapa. ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS (R7 & 8 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES IN THIS PETITION) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt. 29-06-2005 in WP No. 17629/2005 in WP No. 1 LA. NO: 2 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 17629 OF 20051 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioners in 3rd respondent school pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KARNAM RAMESH Counsel for the Respondents: SRI VIJAYA BHASKAR MOOLA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondents: SMT. B MANJULATHA VEDAVALLY The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010604042005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT 1 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13892/2005 Between: K.lakshmi Nirmala, Kadapa & 5 Others and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Secy Ap Social Welfare Residential Edn Society 2 Ors and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner{S): 1.KARNAM RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VIJAYA BHASKAR MOOLA 2.GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 3. B MANJULATHA VEDAVALLY The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.04.2025 and 24.04.2025, there is no representation for the petitioners and the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today. 2. there is no representation for the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I SECTION^ OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Karnam Ramesh Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri Vijaya Bhaskar Moola Advocate [OPUC] ^ [OIJT]"^^ Welfare, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 4. One CC to Sri B Manjulatha Vedavally Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies TF it: 4 \ % HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 \ ORDER ANOH^ S* % WP.No.13892 of 2005 //O ? fi SEP 2025 -I, Current Secuon ^ ££‘aPATC\^^?'^ o ■Ar DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS