APHC010551032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of November, Two Thousand Twenty Five The Honourable Ms.Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition no:28584 Between: 1. Jai Kisan Agro Industries, D.No.4 Kadavakudhuru Road, Inkollu, Prakasam District, Andhra pradesh 523167, rep. by its proprietor, Bandarupalli Rambabu, s/o Venkatadhri, aged 46 years, D.No.6 Bapatla District, Andhra Pradesh 1. The State of A.P., rep. by Secretariat Buildings, V 2. The State of Andhra P and Planning Department, Amaravathi, Guntur district. 3. The Commissioner and Pradesh, Agricultural Department, old M Guntur District. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Dasari S.V.V.S.V.Prasad Counsel for the Respondent 1.Government Pleader for Agriculture. 2.Government Pleader for Finance Planning IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of November, Two Thousand Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms.Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition no:28584 of 2025 Jai Kisan Agro Industries, D.No.4-68, New R.C.C room, Kadavakudhuru Road, Inkollu, Prakasam District, Andhra pradesh 523167, rep. by its proprietor, Bandarupalli Rambabu, s/o Venkatadhri, aged 46 years, D.No.6-109, N.S.L.Textiles Road, Inkollu Mandal, Bapatla District, Andhra Pradesh – 523167. ...Petitioner and rep. by Principal Secretary, Agricultural Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, epartment, Secretariat buildings, V untur district. ommissioner and Director of Agriculture Government of Agricultural Department, old Mirchi Yard, Nallapadu ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: rasad Counsel for the Respondents: nment Pleader for Agriculture. 2.Government Pleader for Finance Planning IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of November, Two Thousand Twenty Five 68, New R.C.C room, Kadavakudhuru Road, Inkollu, Prakasam District, Andhra pradesh- 523167, rep. by its proprietor, Bandarupalli Rambabu, s/o Venkatadhri, s Road, Inkollu Mandal, ...Petitioner epartment, istrict. ecretary, Finance Velagapudi overnment of Andhra allapadu Road, espondents 2 BSB,J W.P.No.28584 of 2025 The court made the following order: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents withholding the amount of Rs.11,70,083/- ( Rupees Eleven Lakhs Seventy Thousand and Eighty Three only) for supply of the seed drillers, 9TYNE cultivators, 3MB Plough, Taiwan Sprayers, Rotovaters etc, by the petitioner firm is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay Rs.11,70,083/- (Rupees Eleven Lakhs Seventy Thousand and Eighty Three only) with interest and to pass such other order which this Court deems fit in the interest of justice. 02. It is the contention of the petitioner that even though the respondents admitted that the petitioner is entitled to the aforesaid amount, no payment has been made. The petitioner contends that such non-payment of money is clearly arbitrary and high-handed, requiring the interference of this Court. 03. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader for Agriculture, while admitting about the claim of the petitioner, placed on record instructions received from the office of Director of Agriculture, Andhra Pradesh, Guntur vide Lr.No.Court case / 28584 / 2025, Dated 24.11.2025 wherein it was mentioned that the total supply subsidy is an amount of Rs.45,85,892/- under SMAM (Submission on Agriculture Mechanization) as per the record available; and that out of the same, Rs.34,42,804/- had been paid to the petitioner, and the balance due is Rs.11,43,088/- only. The instructions further state that the petitioner is required to submit the supporting documents to the respondent No.3 for clearing the admitted amount of Rs.11,43,088/- only. 3 BSB,J W.P.No.28584 of 2025 04. In view of the above instructions, the learned counsel for the petitioner requested to dispose of the writ petition, permitting the petitioner to submit the supporting document to raise the claim not only Rs.11,43,088/- but also for the total amount of Rs.11,70,083/- with liberty to the respondents to examine the entire claim and release the admitted amount and also the higher claim, if found correct. 05. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to submit to the respondent No.3 the documents supporting the claim for Rs.11,70,083/- and thereafter, the respondent No.3 shall verify the documents and release the admitted amount of Rs.11,43,088/- and also the higher claim, if found correct, basing on the documents submitted by the petitioner, within two (02) months after submission of the documents by the petitioner. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated :24.11.2025 GRL 4 BSB,J W.P.No.28584 of 2025 240 The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi W.P. No.28584 of 2025 Date: 24.11.2025. GRL