Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5167 (AP)

KUDULLA NAGAMANI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/2463/2025 · 2025-02-04

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010042372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 2463/2025 Between: 1. KUDULLA NAGAMANI, W/O GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. HOME MAKER, R/O D.NO. 7A-14-15/15. KANDHIKATILU VARI STREET, EAST STREET, ELURU ELURU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BULIDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINSTRATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, ELURU URBAN MANDAL, KOTA DHIBBA, ELURU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri M. Raghunandan, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri D.V. Sasidhar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri K. Arjun Chowdhary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for all the Respondents. 2. It transpires from the record that the name of the husband of the Writ Petitioner in the Cause-title and the description in para 3 of the Affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition are at variance. In the Cause-title, the husband of the Writ Petitioner is mentioned as one Sri Gopala Krishna Rao whereas, in para 3 of the Affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, it is mentioned that the Writ Petitioner is married to one K. Venkata Rao on 18.04.1980. 3. At this stage, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition after correcting the facts. 4. Request granted. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Writ Petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition, if so advised. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 04.02.2025 Vns