Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51669 (AP)

Kanumuru Raghu Rama Krishnam Raju, v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/4587/2019 · 2025-12-08

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010102762019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 4587/2019 Between: 1. KANUMURU RAGHU RAMA KRISHNAM RAJU,, S/O. V S SURYANARAYANARAJU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. 4-58/1, BLOCK-4, AI BHIMAVARAM, AKIVIDU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SDPO, NARASAPURAM, WEST GODAVARI, ANDHRA PRADESH. . 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM II TOWN PS, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto pass an order or orders, direction or writ more particular one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of all the respondents in considering the Complaint dated 31-03-2019, which is registered as FIR No.73/2019 on the file of Bhimavaram II Town Police Station, regarding the circulation of morphed video clip of the petitioner herein which is intended to tarnish his reputation and malign the image of YSR Congress Party as the same is violative of Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct 2 the respondents to forthwith take necessary action to permanently erase the morphed video clips of the petitioner's speech and articles/posts/comments published based on the said video clips from the public domain and pass such other order/s as Hon'ble court may deem fit and IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct all the respondents to forthwith take necessary action to remove the morphed video clips of the petitioner's speech and articles/posts/comments published based on the said video clips from the public domain, pending disposal of this writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VIKRAM POOSERLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VIKRAM POOSERLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 4587 of 2019 O R D E R: Sri P. Vikram, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing the respondents, is in attendance. 3. Permission is accordingly granted. 4. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 9th December, 2025 cbn 4 48 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 4587 of 2019 9th December, 2025 cbn