Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51668 (KAR)

SMT AKKAMAHADEVI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/56258/2017 · 2025-11-24

Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48651 WP No. 56258 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 56258 OF 2017 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: SMT AKKAMAHADEVI SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S 1(a) KISHORE KUMAR S/O NYNACHAAR AGED 30 YEARS 1(b) RAJATH KUMAR S/O NYANACHAAR AGED 28 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO.120, MARASANDRA, HESARAGATTA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK &PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SAMPATH A, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48651 WP No. 56258 of 2017 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE-560 009 3. THE TAHASILDAR BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE-560 009 4. THE GRAMA PANCHAYATH MARASANDRA, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 5. SMT. PUTTATHAYAMMA W/O LATE APPAYACHAR, AGED MAJOR, NO.70/3, 16TH CROSS, 7TH TEMPLE STREET, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003 &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NEELAKANTAPPA K PUJAR, HCGP FOR R1-3, SRI. VINAY SWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R5, R4-SERVICE, HELD SUFFICIENT VIDE ORDER DATED 03.06.2019) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48651 WP No. 56258 of 2017 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE IMPUGNED PROVISIONAL ALLOTMENT DTD 04.09.2012 ISSUED BY THE R- 2 VIDE ANNX-G. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR REPORT SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to dismiss the petition as not pressed. The memo reads as under: "Legal representatives of petitioner seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to dismiss this petition as not pressed. The same may be considered and this petition be dismissed as not pressed, so as to meet the ends of justice and equity." 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Placing reliance on memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24