Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51662 (KAR)

MADHUNANDAN M S v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.P/10104/2025 · 2025-09-16

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37064 CRL.P No. 10104 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10104 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. MADHUNANDAN M.S., S/O C.M.SRINIVASA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC: ENGINEER PERMANENT R/O. NO.36/2, OFFICIAL QUARTERS, SUBHASH NAGAR MANDYA DISTRICT-571 401. NOW RESIDENT OF NO.48, 4TH CROSS, GUDDE ANJANE BADAVANE, KODIPALYA, KENGERI, BENGALURU CITY-560 060 &PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.B.UMESH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAVINDRA B. DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY METAGALLI POLICE STATION, VIJAYANAGARA SUB-DIVISION MYSURU CITY-570 001 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37064 CRL.P No. 10104 of 2025 2. KUMARI INDUSHRI C.R., D/O LATE RAVI AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC: WORKING IN PRIVATE COMPANY R/O NO.194/05, 5TH CROSS, SUBHASHNAGARA, MYSURU CITY -570 008. &RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, ADDL. SPP FOR R1) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.3049/2025 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, MYSURU (CHARGE SHEETED FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 115(2), 118(1), 329(4), 74, 75(2), 352, 351(2) OF BNS 2023 (CORRESPONDING PROVISIONS SECTIONS 323, 324, 448, 354, 354A, 504, 506 OF IPC IN CRIME NO.134/2024 OF METAGALLI POLICE STATION, MYSURU CITY). THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after having argued the matter at length, noticed that this Court was not inclined to grant any indulgence in view of the fact that the charge sheet materials placed on record prima facie disclose the allegations against the petitioner. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37064 CRL.P No. 10104 of 2025 2. At that stage, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appropriate application for discharge before the trial Court. Recording the said submission, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file a discharge application in accordance with law. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE RHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44