Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5166 (PNJ)

UMESH KUMAR v. CHOLAMANDLAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE LIMITED AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/52066/2025 · 2026-04-21

Anoop Chitkara

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

212 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-52066-2025 Date of Decision: 26.02.2026 Umesh Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Cholamandlam Investment and Finance Limited and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate for the respondents. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. 1. On the last date of hearing, following order was passed: “Case called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. List on 26.02.2026. If the petitioner again remains unrepresented, this Court shall either dismiss the present petition for non-prosecution or appoint a legal aid counsel.” 2. Case called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Given above, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. It is clarified that Registry shall not entertain any application for revival of the present petition. Liberty reserved to file fresh. Filing and dismissal of the present petition shall not come in the way of the petitioner. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 26.02.2026 Jyoti Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No. 1 JYOTI SHARMA 2026.03.05 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh