IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLREV No.1025 of 2025 G. Rajesh Dora …. Petitioner Mr. D.P. Dhal, Sr. Advocate Mr. R.C. Swain, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Passinapali Priyanka …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC Mr. PVS Nanaji Achary, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 11.02.2026 05. 1. Heard Mr. D.P. Dhal, learned Senior counsel instructed by Mr. R.C. Swain, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. S. Panigrahi, learned ASC for the State and Mr. PVS N. Achary, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2. 2. Assailing the order of rejection dated 22.11.2025 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge (Women’s Court), Jeypore in G.R. Case No.987 of 2024 arising out of Jeypore Mahila P.S. Case No.149 of 2024, the present CRLREV has been filed. 3. It is submitted by the learned Senior Counsel that during the pendency of the matter, the dispute inter se between the parties has been settled amicably and in furtherance of the settlement the Opposite Party No.2 has received an amount of Rs.17 Lakhs which was transferred to her bank account. 4. Mr. Achary, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2, on instruction, submits that the Opposite Party No.2 has no further grievance more particularly relating to the gold ornament which were gifted to each other during matrimony. 5. It is the further submission of the learned counsel, Mr. Achary, on instruction, that the Opposite Party No.2 does not want to pursue G.R. Case No.987 of 2024 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge (Women’s Court), Jeypore arising out of Jeypore Mahila P.S. Case No.149 of 2024 as well as CRRP No.122 of 2025 on the file of learned Judge, Family Court, Jeypore. 6. Taking note of the same, the aforesaid proceedings are quashed. 7. Accordingly, the CRLREV stands disposed of. 8. It is stated at the Bar that C.P. No.24 of 2026 instituted by the parties under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1954 for mutual divorce is pending on the file of learned Judge Family Court, Dhenkanal. In view of the settlement noted hereinabove, the learned Judge, Family Court, Dhenkanal is requested to consider the waiving of the mandatory period for entertaining such application on the next date which is stated to be on 21.02.2026. 9. Before parting with this case, this Court places on record its deep sense of appreciation for the initiative taken by Mr. Dhal, learned Senior Counsel instructed by Mr. R.C. Swain, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. PVS Nanaji Achary, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 and the Petitioner as well as Opposite Party No.2 for their graciousness in ensuring that the litigation comes to an end and unnecessary acrimony does not precipitate. May the choicest blessings of the Almighty be bestowed on the Petitioner and Opposite Party No.2 to pursue their individual goals in life. (V. Narasingh) Judge Ayesha