- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7828 RFA No. 100118 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100118 OF 2019 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: SHRI ASHOK S/O TIMMANNA NARAPPANAVAR, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HOOLAGERI, TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587 101. … APPELLANT (BY SRI. MRUTYUNJAYA S. HALLIKERI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. MAITRAVATI W/O GOVINDAPPA KILABANUR, AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: GADDANAKERI CROSS, TQ: AND DIST: BAGALKOT-587 101. 2. SHRI TIMMANNA S/O RAMACHANDRAPPA NARAPPANAVAR, SINCE DECEASED BY R/BY HIS LR’S OF RESPONDENTS NO. 3 AND 4. 3. SMT. SHEELAVATI W/O TIMMANNA NARAPPANAVAR, AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: HOOLAGERI, TQ: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587 101. 4. REKHAVATI RAMANAGOUDA GANGARADDI, AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: MUGALIHAL, TQ: SOUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI-590 001. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R3 AND R4; APPEAL DISMISSED AGAINST R2 [V/O/DATED:03.10.2023]) Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7828 RFA No. 100118 of 2019 THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.11.2018 PASSED IN O.S. NO.60/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BADAMI, AT BADAMI. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) The appellant and respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 are present before this Court and submitted a memorandum of compromise petition signed by themselves along with their respective Advocates, stating that all the parties in the appeal have settled the matter amicably out of the Court and therefore, they have requested to pass decree as per the compromise petition by placing the compromise petition on record. 2. Upon enquiry, the appellant and respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 have stated that there is no coercion or undue influence and as per their own will and volition, they have compromised the matter each other. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7828 RFA No. 100118 of 2019 3. Accordingly, the compromise petition is placed on record. 4. In terms of the compromise petition, the appeal is disposed of. 5. Draw decree in terms of compromise petition. The compromise petition shall be part and parcel of the decree. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE SRA CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 55