DR. SURESH CHANDRA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/5932/2025 · 2025-05-13
Vikram D Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51656 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51656 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:78618 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5932 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Suresh Chandra And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Gopal,Prabhakar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dinesh Chandra Mishra Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri S. Shekhar,
learned counsel for respondent-University and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records of the case and to quash the impugned dated 08.08.2023 with letter No.SVP/2023/DAM/623 whereby promotion have been denied to the petitioners and also the part of order dated 08.08.2023 with letter No.SVP/2023/DAM/624 whereby petitioners have been promoted at a belated stage of one year (Annexure nos.1 and 1A to the writ petition). ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to forthwith pass an order in relation to promoting the petitioners w.e.f., 24.03.2021, 22.03.2021 and 24.07.2021 respectively in relation to petitioner nos.1, 2 and 3, if need so arises, by way of reasoned speaking order on the representation of the petitioners which have been preferred alongside other incumbents, to be passed within stipulated period of time which may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court in exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India."
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that by means of impugned order, petitioners have not been given promotion w.e.f. 24.3.2021, 22.3.2021 and 24.7.2021, respectively, however actual promotion has been granted later on. It is submitted by
learned counsel for petitioners that in this respect, petitioners have filed representations before respondents, however till date, no
order has been passed.
4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that representation of petitioners would be decided in a time bound manner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is hereby provided that petitioners shall file fresh representation before
respondent no.4-Director, Administration and Monitoring, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut within 15 days from today along with certified copy of this
order. The same shall be considered and decided by respondent no.4, preferably within a period of two months thereafter.
6. It is clarified that this Court has not decided the issue on merits and the authorities concerned shall independently apply its mind and pass order in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
Order Date :- 14.5.2025 D. Tamang Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad