Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51653 (AP)

GANGAPATLA RAMESH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/30485/2025 · 2025-11-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010585242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30485/2025 Between: 1. GANGAPATLA RAMESH, S/O GANGAPATIA CHINNABBAIAH, AGE 35 YEARS, OCC. ATTENDER IN HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM R/O. ARUNDATHIWADA CHEJARLA MANDAL, MAMUDURU, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 524309. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, III TOWN POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHEJARLA POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK OMER QAIYUM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction preferably in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents especially respondent no.3 to 5 in opening and continuing the suspect sheet vide Suspect sheet no. 19 which is pending on the file of Respondent no.5 against the petitioner is as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, colourable exercise of power and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently quash the suspect sheet no. 19 which was 2 opened against the petitioner and which was pending on the file of Respondent no.5.” 2. Heard Sri Shaik Omer Qaiyum, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that no cases are pending against the petitioner. It is further stated that, to curb and curtail the unlawful activities of the Petitioner in the vicinity, Suspect Sheet was opened against the Petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, the cases registered against the Petitioner were ended in acquittal and no cases are pending against him. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned Suspect Sheet No.19 on the file of Chejarla Police Station, opened against the petitioner, is hereby set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.11.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.30485 of 2025 Dt.06.11.2025 Asr