Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51651 (ALL)

SHYAM NARAYAN SHUKLA v. UNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/13798/2025 · 2025-09-16

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 13798 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents. 2. The petitioner, by means of the present writ petition, has prayed for the following reliefs: "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 2 and 3 to give the compensation of damaged property of the petitioner and re-building and re-location upon the Khata No. 634, Arazi No. 1364M area 0.0230 Hectare and Khata No. 667 Arazi No. 1364 M area 0.0230 Hectare situated at Village Ugrasenpur alias Bibipur, Pargana Mah, Tehsil Handia, district Prayagraj. 2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondnet No. 2 and 3 not to grab the property of the petitioner of Khata No. 634, Arazi No. 1364M area 0.0230 Hectare and Khata No. 667 Arazi No. 1364M area 0.0230 Hectare situated at Village Ugrasenpur alias Bibipur, Pargana Mah, Tehsil Handia, district Prayagraj 1. 3. On perusal of the record, it transpires that the petitioner has already instituted a civil suit bearing No. 514 of 2025 before the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Prayagraj/Fast Track Court, (Shyam Narayan and others vs. Bhartiya Sangh through Mahaprabandhak, Railway), seeking substantially the same reliefs. 4.In view of the fact that the petitioner is prosecuting his claim before the competent Civil Court, the present writ petition, which raises identical issues and seeks similar reliefs, is not maintainable. A litigant cannot be permitted to pursue parallel remedies simultaneously for the same cause Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Azad Rai, C.S.C., Prem Narayan Rai Shyam Narayan Shukla .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) of action. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. September 17, 2025 Sumaira WRIC No. 13798 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad