Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5165 (KAR)

MALLIKARJUN v. SMT GIRIJA

RSA/100369/2024 · 2025-02-17

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF FEBURARY, 2025 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH RSA NO 100369/2024 BETWEEN: 1 . MALLIKARJUN S/O. VEERANAGOUDA PATIL @ GURUNAGOUDRA AGE 51 YEARS OCC BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE R/O. VINAYAK PRINTERS LAXMIBAI CHAWL ISLAMPUR NEAR MUNICIPAL HIGH SCHOOL CHAAKALA CIGARETTE FACTORY ANDHERI EAST MUMBAI-400099. 2 . MANJUNATHGOUDA S/O. VEERANAGOUDA PATIL @ GURUNAGOUDRA AGE 45, OCC BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE R/O. VINAYAK PRINTERS LAXMIBAI CHAWL ISLAMPUR NEAR MUNICIPAL HIGH SCHOOL CHAAKALA CIGARETTE FACTORY ANDHERI EAST MUMBAI-400099. ….APPELLANTS 2 (BY A M MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . SMT GIRIJA W/O. NAGANAGOUDA TEJIGOUDRA SINCE DEASED R/BY HER LRS MALLANAGOUDA S/O. NAGANAGOUDRA TEJIGOUDRA AGE 42, OCC BUSINESS R/O. GIRIJA PRINTERS MARWADI CHAWL KAJODI OPP. BASAN INDUSTRIES CHAAKALA ANDHERI EAST MUMBAI-400099 2 . ANNAPURNA W/O. BASAVARAJ TEJIGOUDRA AGE 36, OCC HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. GANJUR TQ AND DIST HAVERI-581112. 3 . KUM VISHNAVI D/O. BASAVARAJ TEJIGOUDRA AGE 12 OCC STUDENT R/O. GANJUR TQ AND DIST HAVERI-581112 4 . GAGAN S/O. BASAVARAJ TEJIGOUDRA AGE 10 OCC : HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. GANJUR TQ AND DIST HAVERI-581112. 3 RESPONDENTS NO.3 AND 4 ARE MINORS R/BY THEIR MOTHER RESPONDENT NO. 2 I.E., ANNAPURNA W/O. BASAVARAJ TEJIGOUDRA 5 . POOJA W/O. TARANATH PALLED AGE 36 YEARS OCC HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. SAKHANI LAKHANI VILAS PLOT NO.25 PINK CITY AT KUSUGAL APMC ROAD HUBBALLI-580023 6 . NETRA W/O. NITIN REVANKAR AGE 33 YEARS OCCHOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. HUDCO COLONY GADAG TQ AND DIST GADAG-582103 7 . ANNAPURNA W/O. ASHOK NADAGOUDAR AGE 48 YEARS OCC HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. HIREHANDIGOL TQ AND DIST GADAG-582205. ..RESPONDENTS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND PERUSE THE SAME AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 24.01.2024 PASSED BY THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, GADAG IN 4 R.A.NO.95/2021 WHICH WAS DISMISSED ON THE GROUND OF DELAY BY CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.11.2014 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AT GADAG IN O.S.NO.235/2010 AND DISMISS THE SUIT BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following; O R D E R Finally, three weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution. SD/- JUDGE //COPY// Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 20/03/2025, the Advocate for the appellants has not complied with the office objections at Sl No. 1 to 9 and 11. Hence, this RSA No. 100369/2024 shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution as per the Court Order dated 17.02.2025. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. R- By:-rv C- By:-rv T- By: -ran.