Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48395 WP No. 58146 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 58146 OF 2015 (L-ID)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SAI KRISHNA FASHION TEXTILES PVT.LTD., NO.58, MAJRA HOSAHALLI, KASBA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR-561202 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.K.C.SUBRAMANI RAJU AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O. CHENGAMANADADDI &PETITIONER (ABSENT)
AND:
1. A) SRI. N.MAHESHA, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.,
SMT.MANJULA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, W/O. LATE N.MAHESHA,
B) KUM.CHAITRA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, D/O. LATE N.MAHESHA,
C) BHARATH, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O. LATE N.MAHESHA,
Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48395 WP No. 58146 of 2015
ALL ARE RESIDING AT DODDABALLAPURA NAGARA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 2. SRI. GOVINDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O. SRINIVASAPPA, RESIDING AT DODDA TUMKUR VILLAGE AND POST, DODDATUMKUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 3. SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O. SUBBA RAO, RESIDING AT C/O NARAYANSA, VINAYAGAR, COURT ROAD, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 4. SRI. NARASIMHAMURTHY, MAJOR S/O. MUNIRARASAPPA RESIDING AT PAL PAL DINNE, KSS GHATI POST, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 5. SRI.SATEESH KUMAR, MAJOR S/O. DODDA ANJINAPPA, RESIDING AT DODDA TUMKUR VILLAGE AND POST, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 6. SMT.K.PADMA, MAJOR RESIDING AT DODDA TUMKUR VILLAGE AND POST, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48395 WP No. 58146 of 2015
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 7. SRI. D.GOPAL, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O. DODDAMUNIYAPPA, RESIDING AT DODDA TUMKUR VILLAGE AND POST, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 8. SRI.N.RAVI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANA SA, RESIDING AT VINAYAKANAGAR COURT ROAD, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 9. SRI. K.G.GOPALAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O. LATE GANGAPPA, R/AT NO.170, 2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS, VIDYANAGAR, NAGASANDRA POST, BENGALURU-560073. 10. SRI. BYLANJANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O. NANJAPPA, R/AT VEERAPURA VILLAGE AND POST, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 11. SMT.UMADEVI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, W/O. HUTCHAPPA, R/AT CHICKPET, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 12. SRI.P.N.PANDURANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48395 WP No. 58146 of 2015
S/O. NARAYANA RAO, DARJIPET POST, DODDABALLAPUR TOWN, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 13. SRI. BASAVARAJU C., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O. CHANNAPPA, R/AT VEERAPURA VILLAGE AND POST, KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 14.
SMT.T.S.MANJULA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, W/O. N.MANJUNATHA, R/AT VEERAPURA VILLAGE AND POST, KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 15. THE MANAGEMENT OF FUSION APPARELS PVT.LTD., NO.58, MAJRA HOSAHALLI, KASBA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR-561202 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR.M.DHANANJAYA &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.D.KUTTAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R4, R6, R7 AND R9; SRI. G.RAGHU, ADVOCATE FOR R1(A-C), R3, R5, R8, R10 TO R14; VIDE ORDER DATED 14.02.2017, PETITION STANDS DISMISSED AS AGAINST R15; SRI. NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE FOR R1(A), R5, R8, R10 TO R14)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. - 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48395 WP No. 58146 of 2015
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER The name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open court. There is no representation, either through video conferencing or in person. This court vide order dated 17.11.2025 permitted Mr.S.B.Mukkannappa., to retire from the case and directed the office to print the petitioner9s name in the cause list. The petitioner9s name is printed in the cause list. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Resultantly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Because of dismissal of Writ Petition, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and interim relief if any stands discharged. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54