Yandrapragada Raja Rajeswari, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/22802/2023 · 2025-12-07
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51641 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51641 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010439462023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 22802/2023 Between:
1. YANDRAPRAGADA RAJA RAJESWARI, W/O NARASIMHA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/o.DOOR No.2-1-56/1, NEAR GITHA MANDIR, NARASARAOPETA, PALANADU DISTRICT. 2. YANDRAPRAGADA PULI RAJESH,, S/O NARASIMHA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 2-1-56/1, NEAR GITHA MANDIR, NARASARAOPETA,
PALANADU DISTRICT. 3. YANDRAPRAGADA NAGA VENKATESH,, S/O NARASIMHA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 2-1-56/1, NEAR GITHA MANDIR, NARASARAOPETA,
PALANADU DISTRICT. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT R/O.FLAT NO.503, CONNOISSEUR RIVIERA APARTMENT, SAI VAIBHAV COLONY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT OF A.P., VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARSARAOPET. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, II TOWN POLICE STATION, NARASARAOPETA, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. HEAD CONSTABLE, NARSARAOPETA II TOWN POLICE STATION, NARASARAOPETA, PALNADU DISTRICT. 5. BATHULA SUBBA LAKSHMI, W/O VENKATARATNAM, R/O LALITHA DEVI COLONY, NEAR PATTABHIRAMA SWAMI TEMPLE, NARASARAOPETA, PALANADU DISTRICT. 6. KOTHURI RAMA SUBBA RAO, S/O VENKATESHWARLU, R/O D.NO. 12-3-49, AJANTA APARTMENT, PRAKASHNAGAR, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 7. KOTHURI NARASIMHA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU, R/O D.NO. 12-3-31, PRAKASHNAGAR, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 2
8. KOTHURI RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O VENKATESWARLU, R/O D.NO. 20-2-97, KOTABAZAR, RANGA BAZAAR, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 9. KOTHURI RAMESH BABU, S/O VENKATESWARLU, R/O D.NO. 12-3-31, PRAKASHNAGAR, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 10. KOTHURI KISHORE BABU, S/O VENKATESWARLU, R/O D.NO.20-5-29, PRAKASHNAGAR, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 11. KOTHURI SURESH BABU, S/O VENKATESWARLU, R/O D.NO. 12-5-84/15, BACK SIDE OF AVULA SATRAM, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 12. KOTHURI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU, R/O D.NO. 12-3-27/2/A, PRAKASHNAGAR, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 13. KOTHURI MOHANA BABU, S/O RAMA SUBBA RAO, R/O D.NO. 12-3-49, AJANTA APARTMENT, PRAKASHNAGAR, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering with petitioners life and liberty and coercing the petitioners to withdraw the partition suit filed by 1st petitioner against respondents 6 to 12 in O.S.No. 2 of 2019 on the file of XIII Additional District Judge, Narasaraopeta, Palnadu District at the instance of respondents 6 to 13 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief:
“ ... to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering with petitioners life and liberty and coercing the petitioners to withdraw the partition suit filed by 1st petitioner against respondents 6 to 12 in O.S.No.2 of 2019 on the file of the Court of XIII Additional District Judge, Narasaraopeta, Palnadu District at the instance of respondents 6 to 13 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and pass ...”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record written instructions and would submit that there are civil disputes pending between the Petitioners and unofficial respondents and civil suit is pending before the concerned Civil Court, respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties, and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders.
Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording he said
submissions, this Writ Petition may be disposed of.
Recording the submissions and, this Writ Petition is disposed of. The respondent Police are directed not to interfere in civil disputes pending between the parties except under due process of law. No order as to costs.
4
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 08.12.2025
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 22802 of 2023
08.12.2025
Mjl /*