IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO^s: 35 and 37 OF 2018 FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 35 OF 2018 Appeal under section 19 of the Family Courts Act, against the order and decree made in FCOP.NO.1289/2014 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam dated12.12.2017 Between: Smt.Kurumaddala Sushmanjani, W/o K Narendra Kumar, Aged 38 Years, Occ: Husewife, R/o Plot No. 115,1st ward. Housing Board colony, Opp Park Gate, Machilipatnam, Krishna District ...APPELLANT/ PETITIONER AND Kurummaddala Narendra Kumar, S/o K.Ramana Rao,Aged 42 years R/o Vaisakhi Paradise, 3rd Floor, Flat No.302 Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam B.S. Layout ...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant : SRI CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: SRI REDDY VENKATA RAMANA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 37 OF 2018 Appeal under section 19 of the Family Courts Act, against the order and decree made in FCOP.NO.1345/2010 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam dated12.12.2017 Between: Smt.Kurumaddala Sushmanjani, W/o K Narendra Kumar, Aged 38 Years, Occ: Husewife, R/o Plot No.115,1st ward. Housing Board colony, Opp Park Gate, Machilipatnam, Krishna District ...APPELLANT/ PETITIONER AND Kurummaddala Narendra Kumar, S/o K.Ramana Rao,Aged 42 years R/o Vaisakhi Paradise, 3rd Floor, Flat No.302, B.S.Layout Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 12-12-2017 in OP.No. 1345/2010 on the file of the Court of Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam Counsel for the Appellant : SRI CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: M/S NAGA SWETHA ATTILI The Court made the following JUDGMENT : » APHC010042512018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Family Court Appeal No:35 and 37 of 2018 F.C.ANo.35 of 2018 I Between: Smt. Kurumaddala Sushmanjani, W/o. K.Narendra Kumar, aged 38 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Plot No.115, 1"‘ Ward, Housing Board Colony, Opp: Park Gate, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. ...Appellant AND Sri Kurumaddala Narendra Kumar, S/o. K. Ramana Rao, aged 42 years, R/o. Vaisakhi Paradise, 3'^'^ Floor, Flat No.302, B.S Layout, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam. ...Respondent F.C.A No.37 of 2018 Between: Smt. Kurumaddala Sushmanjani, W/o. K.Narendra Kumar, aged 38 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Plot No.115, 1"‘ Ward, Housing Board Colony, Opp: Park Gate, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. ...Appellant AND 1 Sri Kurumaddala Narendra Kumar, S/o. K. Ramana Rao, aged 42 years R/o. Vaisakhi Paradise, 3^^ Floor, Flat No.302, B.S Layout, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam. I ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: 1. Mr. Challa Ajay Kumar Counsel for the Respondent: 1. Ms. Naga Swetha Attili The Court made the following Common Judgment: In view of the letter dated 20.02.2025 addressed by the learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions of the appellant, these Family Court Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- E.KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District ^^^ne CC to SRI. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI. REDDY VENKATA RAMANA, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Ms. NAGA SWETHA ATTILI, Advocate [OPUC] 'V 5. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 6. Three CD Copies MV TAC HIGH COURT DATED: 05/03/2025 JUDGMENT FCA.No’s.35 and 37 of 2018 * c APR 21?^ J ^ . Current iieetion >t£^SPATCV«^fi^ II DISMISSING THE FAMILY COURT APPEALS AS WITHDRAWN