Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54523 WP No. 27621 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 27621 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
M/S PEENYA PACKAGING PRODUCTS, A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.72, CITB INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, 2ND STAGE, YESHWANTHAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 022.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, LATHA JAGANNATHAN.
2.
MRS. LATHA JAGANNATHAN, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, W/O MR. T.T. JAGANNATHAN, HAVING OFFICE AT NO.72, CITB INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, 2ND STAGE, YESHWANTHAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 022.
SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED.
3.
MR. T.T. SRIRAM, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O MR. T.T. RAGHUNATHAN, HAVING OFFICE AT NO.72, CITB INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, 2ND STAGE, YESHWANTHAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 022. &PETITIONERS Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54523 WP No. 27621 of 2023 (BY SRI. GEORGE JOSEPH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. REGISTRAR, CITY CIVIL COURT, CITY CIVIL COURT COMPLEX, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009.
2.
PRINCIPAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, CITY CIVIL COURT, CITY CIVIL COURT COMPLEX, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009.
REP BY ITS REGISTRAR.
3.
MR. M. RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O MR. S K SANNA MANJAPPA, PROPRIETOR OF M/S SURJANA ENTERPRISES, NO.104, KHB VIJAYANANDA NAGAR, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 096. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUBRAMANI M A, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI.YESHU MISHRA, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 ABD 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DTD 06.02.2019 (ANNEXURE-A ) BEARING NO.
CCC (P) 7 2019 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 ON THE
ORDER OF RESPONDENT NO. 2 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54523 WP No. 27621 of 2023
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that petition has been rendered infructuous and accordingly, it may be dismissed.
2. Memo is taken on record. Petition is dismissed as Infurctuous. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE KVR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9