2025:CGHC:16566 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 358 of 2022 Satish Kashyap S/o Ramsnehi Kashyap Aged About 38 Years Presently Posted As Instructor In The Office Of Directorate , Culture And Archaeology, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Culture And Archaeology , Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Directorate Culture And Archaeology , Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Respondents For Petitioner : Smt. Akansha Singh, Advocate. For Respondent /State : Shri Vedant Shadangi, P.L . Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 10/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief : 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ by directing the respondent No.1 & 2 to consider and decide the pending representations (Annexure P/4) within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 10.2 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in favour of the petitioner may kindly be passed. 10.3 Cost of the petition may be awarded. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the grievances project in the writ petition, he has made various representations to various authorities of State but till date the same has not been decided and seeks permission from this Court to decide the same as earliest. ASHISH TIWARI Digitally signed by ASHISH TIWARI Date: 2025.10.17 11:03:26 +0530 -2- 3. Not opposed by the respondents. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and peruse the record. 5. Be that as it may, apart from the representations submitted by the petitioner, he is permitted to make a fresh representation to respondent No.1 and 2 within 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On such representation having been made, the respondents No.1 & 2 shall decide the same within further period of 120 days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. 6. With these observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Ashish