Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51627 (KAR)

MR KUSH SHAH v. M/S FLYYX TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD

CMP/521/2024 · 2025-08-12

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 521 OF 2024 BETWEEN MR. KUSH SHAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, DIRECTOR, M/S. FLYYX TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., RESIDING AT 806, 10TH MAIN, 5TH MAIN, KORAMANGALA 4TH BLOCK, BANGALORE 3 560 034. ...PETITIONER/S (By Sri./Smt : AJAY SHANKAR, ADITI P GOUDAR, ADVOCATES) AND 1. M/S. FLYYX TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT,2013, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT: 4TH FLOOR, MAA GRACE, 7TH CROSS ROAD, KORAMANGALA 1A BLOCK, BENGALURU 3 560 034. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTORS &2 CMP NO.521/2024 2 2. MR DINESH KUMAR GURNANI, AGED : MAJOR, DIRECTOR, M/S FLYYX TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., HAVING OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR, MAA GRACE, 7TH CROSS ROAD, KORAMANGALA 1A BLOCK, BENGALURU 3 560 034. 3. MR. SUNNY GURNANI, AGED : MAJOR, RESIDING AT: # 325, 8TH CROSS ROAD, ST BED LAYOUT, OPPOSITE MANTRI CLASSIC APARTMENT, KORMANGALA, 4TH BLOCK, BANGALORE 3 560 034. 4. MR VENKATESH RAO CHEVURU, AGED : MAJOR, RESIIDNG AT: P2, 4TH FLOOR, ANNAPOORNA STUDIO LIVING, 12/4 HOSUR ROAD, WILSON GARDEN, BENGALURU 3 560027. 5. MR DEEPAK GURNANI, AGED : MAJOR, &3 CMP NO.521/2024 3 RESIDING AT : 20, AMBER RS. 06-02, KINGS MANSION APTS, SINGAPORE 3 439869. 6. MR. MAHINDRA KUMAR CHUGANI, AGED : MAJOR, RESIDING AT: 136, SAINT PATRICKS ROAD, 03-17, SINGAPORE 3 424214. 7. MR PRANABH MODY, AGED : MAJOR, RESIDING AT: 202, CITADEL, LD RUPAREL MARG, MARBAR HILL, MUMBAI 3 400006. 8. MR CHETAN MEHRA, AGED : MAJOR, RESIDING AT : 20, MOTI MAHAL, 3RD FLOOR, DINSHAW VACHA ROAD, CHURCH GATE, MUMBAI 3 400020. 9. MR DHARMENDRA G SIRAJ, AGED: MAJOR, RESIDING AT: 12, GOBIND MAHAL 86B, &4 CMP NO.521/2024 4 NETAJI SUBHASH ROAD, MARINE DRIVE ,MUMBAI 3 500002. &RESPONDENT/S The Advocate for the petitioner has filed the above Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying that this Hon9ble Court be pleased to 1.Appoint an Arbitrator in terms of Clause 18 of the SHA dated 10.03.2022 (At Annexure 8A9) so as to arbitrate the disputes between the parties 2.Grant costs of this petition to the Petitioners, and 3.Grant such other relief as this Hon9ble court deems fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following order. ORAL ORDER Finally, one week time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution, without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE &5 CMP NO.521/2024 5 NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 12.08.2025, the office objections are not complied with, hence, the petition is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : VS C By : GS Ty dt : 29.08.2025 C.dt : 03.09.2025