APHC010858082018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 41405/2018 Between: 1. DAMA MADHUKAR REDDY,, S/O. LAKSHMI NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, OFFICE AT 1ST FLOOR, RAMBO TOWERS, SUBASH ROAD, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT G-5 AND 6, SECTOR-10, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. 2. THE REGIONAL OFFICER, REGIONAL OFFICE-CHENNAI, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, SRI TOWER, 3RD FLOOR, DP-34(SP), INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, GUINDY, CHENNAI. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT-CHENNAI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 1St respondent in calling for tenders on 06.11.2018 relating to the work relating to collection of toll plaza from S.V.Puram fee plaza at KM 305.800 for the section from KM 274.800 to KM 341.600 (Tirupathi-Tiruthani-Chennai Section) of NH-205 in the State of 2 JS, J W.P.No.41405/2018 Tamilnadu even though the contract agreement dated 23.10.2018 is in force as illegal, arbitrary and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including award of the contract in pursuance of the tender notification issued by the 1st respondent on 06-11-2018 in respect of the work relating to collection of toll plaza from S.V puram fee plaza at KM 305.800 for the section from KM 274.800 to KM 341.600 (Tirupathi Tiruthani- Chennai Section) of NH-205 in the state of Tamilnadu, pending disposal of the WP. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S S VARMA (SC FOR NHAI) 3 JS, J W.P.No.41405/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 22.11.2025 rsd 4 JS, J W.P.No.41405/2018 65 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 41405/2018 Date: 22.11.2025 rsd