Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51619 (AP)

Jogi Ramesh v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/48128/2018 · 2025-12-08

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010997022018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 48128/2018 Between: 1. JOGI RAMESH, S/O. JOGI MOHAN RAO, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC. EX-MLA, R/O. D.NO. 12-41, RING CENTER, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ARUNDALPET P.S., GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR. 5. Y SRINIVASA RAO, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARUNDELPET P.S., GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 6. VARLA RAMAIAH, S/O. ISSAC, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. STATE TDP GENERAL SECRETARY, R/O. NTR BHAVAN, ARANDELPET, 12TH LINE, GUNTUR TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in initiating criminal proceedings including the impugned proceedings dated 15.12.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, biased and in violation of Article 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings vide impugned proceedings dated 15.12.2018 issued by the 4th respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C B ADARSH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.48128 of 2018 ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is posted today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even on earlier occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing respondent Nos.1 to 4, is in attendance. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 4. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 9th December, 2025 cbn 4 47 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.48128 of 2018 9th December, 2025 cbn