Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:136886 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 15928 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Chhaya Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Harshit Pandey Connected with Writ-A Nos. 49857 of 2017; 49858 of 2017; 58964 of 2017; 25961 of 2018; 4221 of 2018; 6241 of 2019; 8813 of 2019; 8948 of 2019; 7034 of 2020; 8850 of 2020; 1222 of 2021; 13190 of 2021; 9248 of 2021; 15428 of 2022; 15724 of 2022; 17524 of 2022; 18304 of 2022; 4798 of 2022; 7189 of 2022; 86 of 2022; 10109 of 2023; 10682 of 2023; 10689 of 2023; 10703 of 2023; 10853 of 2023; 12442 of 2023; 12910 of 2023; 13764 of 2023; 13820 of 2023; 15433 of 2023; 15792 of 2023; 15816 of 2023; 15911 of 2023; 15915 of 2023; 15925 of 2023; 15933 of 2023; 15947 of 2023; 16551 of 2023; 16672 of 2023; 17467 of 2023; 17577 of 2023; 17592 of 2023; 18720 of 2023; 18814 of 2023; 20928 of 2023; 9509 of 2023; 9929 of 2023; 11213 of 2024; 11601 of 2024; 3242 of 2024; 4017 of 2024; 481 of 2024; 4985 of 2024; 4986 of 2024; 5006 of 2024; 5025 of 2024; 5031 of 2024; 5044 of 2024; 5067 of 2024; 5695 of 2024; 5766 of 2024; 5767 of 2024; 5768 of 2024; 5774 of 2024; 662 of 2024; 6977 of 2024; 6979 of 2024; 6980 of 2024; 7009 of 2024; 7033 of 2024; 7187 of 2024; 7212 of 2024; 7410 of 2024; 7419 of 2024; 7427 of 2024; 7432 of 2024; 7444 of 2024; 7447 of 2024; 7481 of 2024; 7491 of 2024; 7502 of 2024; 7515 of 2024; 7595 of 2024; 7944 of 2024; 7945 of 2024; 7946 of 2024; 8004 of 2024; 8079 of 2024; and, 11427 of 2025 Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
1. Heard Sri Deepak Singh, Advocate for petitioners in Writ-A Nos. 15928 of 2023; 15911 of 2023; 15915 of 2023; 15925 of 2023; 15933 of 2023; 15947 of 2023; 4985 of 2024; 4986 of 2024; 5006 of 2024; 5025 of 2024; 5031 of 2024; 5044 of 2024 and 5067 of 2024 as well as Sri Sanjeev Patel, Advocates for petitioners in Writ-A No. 11427 of 2025. None appeared of petitioners in rest of petitions.
Sri Harshit Pandey, Advocate for Respondent-Nagar Nigam as well as Sri Vipul Kumar, Advocate for Respondent-LIC, are present. 2
2. In Writ-A No. 11427 of 2025 this Court passed following order on 11.08.2025:
“1. On bare perusal of affidavit to accompanying writ petition, the Court is convinced that deponent is nowhere concerned with petitioners. Deponent, Radha, has declared herself as District President (Female) of Bhartiya Balmiki Kalyaan Mahasabha whereas present writ petition is filed by individual petitioners. 2. The Court is surprised how she can depose on behalf of petitioners. It being a fraud, therefore, let deponent, Radha, District President (Female) of Bhartiya Balmiki Kalyaan Mahasabha, wife of Baburam, resident of District Kanpur Nagar, appear before this Court tomorrow at 12.00 Noon to explain that why not she be punished for approaching this Court without any authority. 3. Let bailable warrant be issued to ensure her presence through Chief Judicial Magistrate and Senior Superintendent of Police concerned. 4. Sri Sanjeev Patel, learned counsel for petitioners shall also ensure presence of all petitioners in Court tomorrow at 12.00 Noon. 5. Put up tomorrow, i.e., 12.08.2025 at 12.00 Noon alongwith Writ- A No. 5766 of 2024. 6. Registrar (Compliance) to take steps.”
3. Today, deponent of said writ petition, i.e., Radha, District President (Female) of Bhartiya Balmiki Kalyaan Mahasabha, as well as some of the petitioners are present in Court. The deponent is absolutely unable to explain under what capacity she has filed affidavit in support of writ petition. However, she extended unqualified apology, which is accepted and she undertakes to remain careful and not to file such kind of affidavit in future. 4. This bunch of writ petitions are arising out of non payment of retiral dues etc. to petitioners.
In some of the cases some retiral dues are paid and so far as remaining legally permissible dues are concerned, learned counsel
3 for Respondent-Nagar Nigam submits that after verification due amount will also be paid within a period of eight weeks from today. 5. In some of the writ petitions the dispute is with regard to payment of insurance from Respondent-LIC and for that learned counsel for Respondent-LIC submits that after verification, if due amount is still not forwarded to employer, the same will be forwarded within a period of six weeks from today and thereafter employer will pay the same to respective claimants/ petitioners. 6. Taking note of aforesaid assurance given by learned counsel for respondents, all these writ petitions are disposed of. In case of any dispute of calculation of due amount the petitioners are at liberty to raise their respective grievance before concerned respondent. Order Date :- 12.08.2025 AK Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad