IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1116 of 2025 ------ 1. Mojammil Ansari @ Bablu, aged about 30 years, s/o Abu Talib Ansari, r/o Village-Talab Mohalla Hochar, P.O. & P.S.-Kanke, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand 2. Eid Mohmmad, aged about 22 years, s/o Azad Ansari, r/o Vill-Pokhar Toli Hochar, P.O. & P.S.-Kanke, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sourabh Kr. Das, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 18.02.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No.04 of 2019 registered under sections 147/148/ 149/152/153/332/333/337/338/353/307/427/435/436 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners being member of unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons attempted to murder the public servant-police personnel. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and there is no allegation of any injury sustained by anybody and the allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that there is no basis upon which the petitioners have been implicated in this case and the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 20 of the anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person has already been given the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 06.09.2023 and 28.01.2025 in A.B.A. Nos.5576 of 2023 and 478 of 2025 respectively. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Ranchi, in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No.04 of 2019 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-