APHC010675632022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 40879/2022 Between: 1. GADDAM VEERAIAH, S/O PEDA RAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,THOORPU MALAPALEM VILLAGE KALIGIRI MANDALAM SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALIGIRI POLICE STATION,KALIGIRI MANDALAM SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. GADDAM ANOOSHA, W,O.VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,THOORPU MALAPALEM VILLAGE, KALIGIRI MANDALAM SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 3rd respondent who has been forcing the petitioner and his family members to compromise in matrimonial dispute with 4th Respondent by calling them again and again to his station ignoring the pending Divorce petition H.M.O.P.No.1/2019 on the file 2 of the Honourable Senior Civil Judge Court, Kavali and inaction of the 2nd respondent in respect of the representation dated 3-12-2022 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioner and his family members to the 3rd respondent police station, Kaligiri Town and Mandal, Nellore District with regard to the matrimonial disputes in between the petitioner and 4th respondent and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DR G V RAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 40879 of 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 3rd respondent who has been forcing the petitioner and his family members to compromise in matrimonial dispute with 4th Respondent by calling them again and again to his station ignoring the pending Divorce petition H.M.O.P.No.1/2019 on the file of the Honourable Senior Civil Judge Court, Kavali and inaction of the 2nd respondent in respect of the representation dated 3-12-2022 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice and pass such.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.11.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.40879 of 2022 Dated.06.11.2025 UPS 211