Choppala Nageshwara Rao, v. Sri Karthikeya Mistra,
CC/1829/2018 · 2025-11-12
Ninala Jayasurya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51602 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51602 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010530672018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE No.1829 of 2018 Between: Choppala Nageshwara Rao, S/o.Mahalaxmi, Aged about 66 years, Occ:Agriculture, R/o.H.No.4-46, Pedapatnam Lanka, Geddamvari peta, Mamidikuduru, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. … Petitioner
AND Sri Karthikeya Mistra, I.A.S., District Collector, East Godavari District, Kakinada. … Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.G.K.Rama Chandra Chary Counsel for the Respondent : G.P. for Assignment
The Court made the following ORDER:
Though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the earlier occasion also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Perused the counter affidavit of the sole respondent. In paragraph No.8, it is stated that pursuant to the orders in the writ petition, the matter was considered after giving opportunity to the petitioner and others and Proceedings dated … August, 2018 have been issued. Be that as it may.
3. In view of compliance of the order dated 19.6.2017, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J November 13, 2025 / vasu