Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51601 (KAR)

SRI DHANANJAYA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/14403/2025 · 2025-11-24

Shivashankar Amarannavar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48367 CRL.P No. 14403 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14403 OF 2025 [(439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)] BETWEEN: SRI DHANANJAYA S/O RAM ASHISH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, CURRENTLY RESIDING AT SURYA PLAZA PG, KAMMANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 043. PERMANENT ADDRESS AT: C/O RAMASHISH JHA, HOUSE NO.10, CHOGANIA MOHALLA, SHIKAR PUR, SOUTH WEST DELHI, DELHI - 110 043. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHESH Y L., ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA MUDIGERE P.S. REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001. &RESPONDENT (BY SMT. PUSHPALATHA B., ADDITIONAL SPP) Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48367 CRL.P No. 14403 of 2025 THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.PC (FILED UNDER SECTION 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE HIM ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.145/2025 REGISTERED BY MUDIGERE POLICE STATION, NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) AND J.M.F.C MUDIGERE, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT, FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 140(2) OF BNS, 2023. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo. Memo reads thus: "The undersigned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the matter in Crime No.145 of 2025 has been compromised between the de-facto complainant and the accused (including the petitioner) by virtue of which both the parties had approached this Hon'ble High Court under section 528 of BNSS, and consequently the FIR in Crime No.145 of 2025 stands quashed and the petitioner who was in judicial custody has been released from judicial custody and therefore the present bail application does not survive for consideration and by taking this memo on record the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the above matter in the interest of justice." In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE BKM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 69