MANISH SONKER AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/6433/2017 · 2025-09-03
Samit Gopal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51591 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51591 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6433 of 2017 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.
1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicants to press this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
3. Sri V.D. Ojha, learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants- Manish Sonker, Badku @ Vikram Sonker, Chinta Devi and Rohit, with the following prayers:
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the present application quash the charge 1302 of 2016 sheet no.91 of 2016 State Versus Manish Sonker and other arising out of case crime no. 309 of 2015 under section 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police District Chandauli, Station Chakia, in which cognizance taken on 11.8.2016, pending in the court of Learned Judicial Magistrate Chakiya, District Chandauli. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the further proceedings of case no. 1302 of 2016 (State Versus Manish Sonker and other) arising out of case crime no. 309 of 2015 under section 498A 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Polic Station Chakia, District Chandauli, pending in the court of Learned Judicial Magistrate District Chakiya, otherwise the Chandauli, District applicants shall suffer irreparable loss and injury. And/or pass such other and further orders which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."
5. This matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court vide order dated 01.03.2017 subject to deposit of Rs. 25,000/-by the applicant. As per report of the Mediation Centre dated 11.05.2017 the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manish Sonker And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
applicants have not deposited the said money before the Centre till
10.05.2017. 6. In view of the same, this matter is reported by the office through the report dated 03.03.2025 of Registrar (J) (Listing) that it is likely to be infructuous. 7. Perused the records. 8. Since there is no one appearing on behalf of the applicant to press this application U/s 482 Cr.P.C., the matter being likely to have become infructuous by efflux of time, the same is dismissed as such.
9. The present application is dismissed as infructuous. 10. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 11. Office to communicate this order to the District and Sessions Judge/trial court concerned within a week. September 4, 2025 AS Rathore A482 No. 6433 of 2017 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad