1 ' “*^4. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY .THE SECOND DAY OF MAY ^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT ^ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3266 OF 2013 Between; The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Anantapur. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Regional Secretary, APSRTC Employees Union, Ananthapur, Rep. (1)N. Abhisekham, S/o N. Chinnaiah, (2)B. Narasimhulu, S/o B, Seshaiah, (3)C. Chikanna, S/o C. Chikkaiah, Sweepers, Last Grade Employees ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari declaring the award made in I.D. No. 18 of 2011 dt. 19-07-2012 on the file of the Chairman cum-Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Ananthapur as illegal, arbitrary and quash the same by calling for records relating to the said award dated 19.07.2012. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 4044 OF Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant intenrn suspension of the award dated: 19.7,2012 made in I.D.No. 18 of 2011 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal-cum Labour Court, Ananthapur, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. NAGARAJU NAGURU, Standing Counsel For APGENCO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI VENKATA RAMAIAH The Court made the following Order: KARUMURI APHC010275412013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 3266/2013 [3330] 0^: RAO Between: The Regional Manager, APSRTC ...PETITIONER AND The Regional Secretary, APSRTC Employees Union and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: TNagaraju Naguru Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Venkata Ramaiah Karumuri The Court made the following: 9 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 3266 of 2013 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting its case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO deputy REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. Nagaraju Naguru, Standing Counsel for APGENCO [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri. Venkata Ramaiah Karumuri, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies vna HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.3266 of 2013 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS